🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during wider concerns about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” said Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, BAT suggests this be decreased to 30% or 50% “according to global recommended threshold”, delayed for at least 12 months after the law is enacted.

The WHO actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for different infractions “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that underage people should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.