🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where African descendants are paid to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The month has evolved since its inception, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the month is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.