🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, threatening phone calls continued. Originally, reportedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, and then from the authorities. Finally, one resident asserts he was called to the police station and warned explicitly: keep quiet or face serious consequences.

Shaikh is one of many fighting a multimillion-dollar project where Dharavi – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – faces razed and redeveloped by a corporate giant.

"The distinctive community of Dharavi is like nowhere else in the planet," states Shaikh. "However they want to destroy our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of Dharavi stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and elite residences that dominate the neighborhood. Dwellings are assembled randomly and frequently without proper sanitation, informal businesses release harmful emissions and the environment is permeated by the suffocating smell of open sewers.

To some, the prospect of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of luxury high-rises, organized recreational areas, contemporary malls and homes with multiple bathrooms is an aspirational dream realized.

"There's no sufficient health services, roads or sewage systems and there are no spaces for children to play," says a tea vendor, 56, who relocated from his home state in the early eighties. "The sole solution is to tear it all down and construct proper housing."

Local Protest

However, some, including this protester, are resisting the redevelopment.

None deny that the slum, long neglected as an illegal encroachment, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. However they worry that this plan – absent of resident participation – is one that will turn valuable urban land into an elite enclave, displacing the disadvantaged, migrant communities who have lived there since the late 1800s.

These were these marginalized, migrant workers who developed the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of community resilience and business activity, whose output is valued at between $1m and $2m a year, making it a major unregulated sectors.

Relocation Worries

Among approximately 1 million inhabitants living in the packed 220-hectare area, a minority will be able for new homes in the development, which is projected to take an extended timeframe to finish. Others will be relocated to barren areas and salt plains on the far outskirts of the metropolis, potentially fragment a historic community. Certain individuals will not get homes at all.

Those allowed to continue living in the area will be given flats in tower blocks, a significant rupture from the natural, collective approach of dwelling and laboring that has sustained the community for many years.

Commercial activities from garment work to clay work and waste processing are likely to decrease in quantity and be transferred to a specific "industrial sector" distant from residential areas.

Survival Challenge

In the case of the leather artisan, a leather artisan and long-time resident to call home the slum, the plan presents a fundamental risk. His rickety, three-storey workshop makes garments – sharp blazers, luxury coats, fashionable garments – distributed in premium stores in the city's affluent areas and internationally.

Relatives dwells in the rooms below and his workers and tailors – laborers from north India – reside there, permitting him to manage costs. Away from the slum, accommodation prices are frequently 10 times as high for a single room.

Harassment and Intimidation

At the official facilities nearby, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative depicts a contrasting vision for the future. Well-groomed residents gather on bicycles and electric vehicles, acquiring continental baguettes and croissants and enlisting beverages on a patio outside a restaurant and treat station. This represents a complete departure from the inexpensive idli sambar morning meal and low-cost tea that sustains Dharavi's community.

"This isn't progress for residents," states the artisan. "This constitutes an enormous property transaction that will make it unaffordable for us to survive."

Furthermore, there's skepticism of the development company. Headed by an influential industrialist – a leading figure and a close ally of the government head – the business group has faced accusations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it denies.

Although the state government calls it a collaborative effort, the corporation paid $950m for its 80% stake. A lawsuit claiming that the project was improperly granted to the business group is under review in the top court.

Ongoing Pressure

Since they began to actively protest the redevelopment, Shaikh and other residents claim they have been faced ongoing efforts of pressure and threats – comprising communications, clear intimidation and implications that speaking against the project was equivalent to opposing national interests – by individuals they allege represent the business conglomerate.

Part of the group suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c